TOP INDIVIDUAL 2010 16: G Narkiewicz | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | K Jassem-L Ohrysko,*-Z Ingielewicz | 1 | WE | 3 | S | Q | -2 | +100 | 58.33% | 58.33% | ||
K Jassem-*,Z Ingielewicz-L Ohrysko | 2 | NS | 2× | E | 3 | -1 | +100 | 75.00% | 66.67% | |||
K Jassem-Z Ingielewicz,L Ohrysko-* | 3 | WE | 3 | E | 10 | +2 | +660 | 50.00% | 61.11% | |||
2 | A Kowalski-T Winciorek,*-M Krajewski | 4 | WE | 3 | E | 2 | = | +600 | 54.17% | 59.38% | ||
A Kowalski-*,M Krajewski-T Winciorek | 5 | NS | 3× | W | A | -3 | +500 | 91.67% | 65.83% | |||
A Kowalski-M Krajewski,T Winciorek-* | 6 | WE | 2 | N | 4 | -1 | +50 | 45.83% | 62.50% | |||
3 | M Kwiecień-J Stępiński,*-J Brede | 7 | WE | 4 | E | 6 | +1 | +650 | 50.00% | 60.71% | ||
M Kwiecień-*,J Brede-J Stępiński | 8 | NS | 4 | E | 2 | -1 | +50 | 79.17% | 63.02% | |||
M Kwiecień-J Brede,J Stępiński-* | 9 | WE | 4 | E | 10 | +1 | +660 | 66.67% | 63.43% | |||
4 | K Lasocki-V Vainikonis,*-L Kurzela | 10 | WE | 4 | W | J | +2 | +680 | 100.00% | 67.08% | ||
K Lasocki-*,L Kurzela-V Vainikonis | 11 | NS | 2 | W | J | -2 | +100 | 62.50% | 66.67% | |||
K Lasocki-L Kurzela,V Vainikonis-* | 12 | WE | 4 | S | Q | -3 | +300 | 75.00% | 67.36% | |||
5 | T Przybora-T Puczyński,*-D Sierocki | 13 | WE | 3 | N | 3 | +2 | -660 | 4.17% | 62.50% | ||
T Przybora-*,D Sierocki-T Puczyński | 14 | NS | 3 | W | 2 | +4 | -520 | 66.67% | 62.80% | |||
T Przybora-D Sierocki,T Puczyński-* | 15 | WE | 6 | N | K | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 65.28% | |||
6 | *-C Balicki,J Pszczoła-M Malinowska | 16 | NS | 5× | S | 6 | -2 | -300 | 50.00% | 64.32% | ||
*-J Pszczoła,M Malinowska-C Balicki | 17 | NS | 5 | N | 2 | +2 | +440 | 0.00% | 60.54% | |||
*-M Malinowska,C Balicki-J Pszczoła | 18 | NS | 2× | S | J | -2 | -500 | 4.17% | 57.41% | |||
7 | T Puczyński-P Gawryś,*-M Malinowska | 19 | WE | 5 | S | A | = | -450 | 37.50% | 56.36% | ||
T Puczyński-*,M Malinowska-P Gawryś | 20 | NS | 6 | S | 7 | -1 | -100 | 4.17% | 53.75% | |||
T Puczyński-M Malinowska,P Gawryś-* | 21 | WE | 3 | N | Q | +1 | -630 | 16.67% | 51.98% | |||
8 | E Grabowska-R Dancewicz,*-J Kalita | 22 | WE | 3 | S | 3 | -2 | +100 | 29.17% | 50.95% | ||
E Grabowska-*,J Kalita-R Dancewicz | 23 | NS | 2× | S | A | = | +670 | 100.00% | 53.08% | |||
E Grabowska-J Kalita,R Dancewicz-* | 24 | WE | 6 | N | 10 | = | -920 | 8.33% | 51.22% | |||
9 | *-L Kurzela,L Ohrysko-A Kowalski | 25 | NS | 3 | N | A | = | +140 | 8.33% | 49.50% | ||
*-L Ohrysko,A Kowalski-L Kurzela | 26 | NS | 3 | S | 3 | +2 | +660 | 100.00% | 51.44% | |||
*-A Kowalski,L Kurzela-L Ohrysko | 27 | NS | 2 | N | 3 | = | +110 | 79.17% | 52.47% | |||
10 | *-A Kowalski,E Vainikonis-K Jassem | 28 | NS | 4 | E | 3 | +1 | -450 | 45.83% | 52.23% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,K Jassem-A Kowalski | 29 | NS | 5× | E | 3 | -3 | +800 | 100.00% | 53.88% | |||
*-K Jassem,A Kowalski-E Vainikonis | 30 | NS | 6× | S | K | -4 | -800 | 0.00% | 52.08% | |||
11 | T Townsend-K Jassem,*-E Vainikonis | 1 | WE | 3 | N | 3 | +1 | -430 | 16.67% | 50.94% | ||
T Townsend-*,E Vainikonis-K Jassem | 2 | NS | 4 | N | 7 | +1 | +650 | 100.00% | 52.47% | |||
T Townsend-E Vainikonis,K Jassem-* | 3 | WE | 3 | E | J | +2 | +660 | 54.17% | 52.53% | |||
12 | *-R Dancewicz,A Malinowski-T Townsend | 4 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | = | +600 | 66.67% | 52.94% | ||
*-A Malinowski,T Townsend-R Dancewicz | 5 | NS | 2× | S | 10 | +1 | +870 | 95.83% | 54.17% | |||
*-T Townsend,R Dancewicz-A Malinowski | 6 | NS | 6× | S | K | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 52.66% | |||
13 | T Townsend-E Vainikonis,*-R Dancewicz | 7 | WE | 2 | N | 8 | +2 | -170 | 87.50% | 53.60% | ||
T Townsend-*,R Dancewicz-E Vainikonis | 8 | NS | 4 | W | 6 | +1 | -450 | 16.67% | 52.63% | |||
T Townsend-R Dancewicz,E Vainikonis-* | 9 | WE | 4 | N | A | = | -420 | 40.96% | 52.33% | |||
14 | A Kowalski-L Ohrysko,J Kalita-* | 10 | WE | 3 | W | 6 | = | +600 | 45.83% | 52.17% | ||
A Kowalski-J Kalita,*-L Ohrysko | 11 | WE | 6 | E | 5 | -1 | -50 | 12.50% | 51.20% | |||
A Kowalski-*,L Ohrysko-J Kalita | 12 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | +3 | +690 | 66.67% | 51.57% | |||
15 | M Szymanowski-L Ohrysko,*-Z Ingielewicz | 13 | WE | 4 | S | Q | +1 | -150 | 29.17% | 51.05% | ||
M Szymanowski-*,Z Ingielewicz-L Ohrysko | 14 | NS | 3 | N | 2 | -1 | -50 | 75.00% | 51.59% | |||
M Szymanowski-Z Ingielewicz,L Ohrysko-* | 15 | WE | 3× | N | A | -3 | +800 | 100.00% | 52.67% | |||
SUMA: | 52.67% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 52.67% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 15 |
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2010-03-27 o 22:46:25