| TOP INDIVIDUAL 2010 21: T Townsend | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | J Pszczoła-E Czubak,*-D Sierocki | 1 | WE | 1![]() | N | 2 | +1 | -120 | 0.00% | 0.00% | ||
| J Pszczoła-*,D Sierocki-E Czubak | 2 | NS | 3 × | E | 3 | -3 | +500 | 100.00% | 50.00% | |||
| J Pszczoła-D Sierocki,E Czubak-* | 3 | WE | 3![]() | E | 10 | +2 | +660 | 50.00% | 50.00% | |||
| 2 | M Szymanowski-K Puczyński,*-E Vainikonis | 4 | WE | 4![]() | W | 2 | -1 | -100 | 8.33% | 39.58% | ||
| M Szymanowski-*,E Vainikonis-K Puczyński | 5 | NS | 1![]() | N | 3 | +1 | +120 | 25.00% | 36.67% | |||
| M Szymanowski-E Vainikonis,K Puczyński-* | 6 | WE | 4![]() | N | 5 | -1 | +50 | 45.83% | 38.19% | |||
| 3 | P Tuszyński-T Paluchowski,*-R Dancewicz | 7 | WE | 4![]() | W | 8 | +2 | +680 | 91.67% | 45.83% | ||
| P Tuszyński-*,R Dancewicz-T Paluchowski | 8 | NS | 4![]() | W | 2 | -1 | +50 | 79.17% | 50.00% | |||
| P Tuszyński-R Dancewicz,T Paluchowski-* | 9 | WE | 2 × | S | 2 | -3 | +500 | 16.67% | 46.30% | |||
| 4 | K Buras-Z Kowalewski,*-M Tekień | 10 | WE | 3![]() | E | 7 | +2 | +660 | 83.33% | 50.00% | ||
| K Buras-*,M Tekień-Z Kowalewski | 11 | NS | 1![]() | S | K | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 45.45% | |||
| K Buras-M Tekień,Z Kowalewski-* | 12 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | -1 | -50 | 37.50% | 44.79% | |||
| 5 | B Chmurski-Ł Brede,*-M Malinowska | 13 | WE | 4![]() | W | 5 | -1 | -100 | 91.67% | 48.40% | ||
| B Chmurski-*,M Malinowska-Ł Brede | 14 | NS | 7![]() | E | 10 | = | -1520 | 0.00% | 44.94% | |||
| B Chmurski-M Malinowska,Ł Brede-* | 15 | WE | 5 × | E | 8 | -3 | -500 | 87.50% | 47.78% | |||
| 6 | J Russyan-T Winciorek,D Sierocki-* | 16 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | = | +620 | 91.67% | 50.52% | ||
| J Russyan-D Sierocki,*-T Winciorek | 17 | WE | 6![]() | N | 2 | +1 | -940 | 29.17% | 49.26% | |||
| J Russyan-*,T Winciorek-D Sierocki | 18 | NS | 3![]() | E | 5 | -2 | +100 | 91.67% | 51.62% | |||
| 7 | M Krajewski-*,M Tekień-T Radko | 19 | NS | 4![]() | N | J | +1 | +450 | 62.50% | 52.19% | ||
| M Krajewski-M Tekień,T Radko-* | 20 | WE | 3![]() | S | 3 | +3 | -690 | 58.33% | 52.50% | |||
| M Krajewski-T Radko,*-M Tekień | 21 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | = | -600 | 54.17% | 52.58% | |||
| 8 | J Stępiński-E Vainikonis,L Kurzela-* | 22 | WE | 3 ×× | E | 2 | = | +1000 | 100.00% | 54.73% | ||
| J Stępiński-L Kurzela,*-E Vainikonis | 23 | WE | 2 × | N | Q | -2 | +500 | 33.33% | 53.80% | |||
| J Stępiński-*,E Vainikonis-L Kurzela | 24 | NS | 3![]() | S | 2 | +2 | +460 | 16.67% | 52.26% | |||
| 9 | E Miszewska-K Kotorowicz,*-E Vainikonis | 25 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | +2 | -200 | 75.00% | 53.17% | ||
| E Miszewska-*,E Vainikonis-K Kotorowicz | 26 | NS | 5![]() | N | 6 | -2 | -200 | 8.33% | 51.44% | |||
| E Miszewska-E Vainikonis,K Kotorowicz-* | 27 | WE | 1![]() | W | A | +2 | +150 | 87.50% | 52.78% | |||
| 10 | E Miszewska-*,R Dancewicz-J Kalita | 28 | NS | 4![]() | E | 7 | +1 | -450 | 45.83% | 52.53% | ||
| E Miszewska-R Dancewicz,J Kalita-* | 29 | WE | 5![]() | N | A | = | -650 | 25.00% | 51.58% | |||
| E Miszewska-J Kalita,*-R Dancewicz | 30 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | = | +420 | 54.17% | 51.67% | |||
| 11 | *-K Jassem,G Narkiewicz-E Vainikonis | 1 | NS | 3![]() | N | 3 | +1 | +430 | 83.33% | 52.69% | ||
| *-G Narkiewicz,E Vainikonis-K Jassem | 2 | NS | 4![]() | N | 7 | +1 | +650 | 100.00% | 54.17% | |||
| *-E Vainikonis,K Jassem-G Narkiewicz | 3 | NS | 3![]() | E | J | +2 | -660 | 45.83% | 53.91% | |||
| 12 | G Narkiewicz-R Dancewicz,A Malinowski-* | 4 | WE | 3![]() | S | 5 | = | -600 | 33.33% | 53.31% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-A Malinowski,*-R Dancewicz | 5 | WE | 2 × | S | 10 | +1 | -870 | 4.17% | 51.90% | |||
| G Narkiewicz-*,R Dancewicz-A Malinowski | 6 | NS | 6 × | S | K | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 50.46% | |||
| 13 | *-E Vainikonis,G Narkiewicz-R Dancewicz | 7 | NS | 2![]() | N | 8 | +2 | +170 | 12.50% | 49.44% | ||
| *-G Narkiewicz,R Dancewicz-E Vainikonis | 8 | NS | 4![]() | W | 6 | +1 | -450 | 16.67% | 48.57% | |||
| *-R Dancewicz,E Vainikonis-G Narkiewicz | 9 | NS | 4![]() | N | A | = | +420 | 59.04% | 48.84% | |||
| 14 | M Malinowska-K Puczyński,*-E Czubak | 10 | WE | 3![]() | W | 5 | = | +600 | 45.83% | 48.77% | ||
| M Malinowska-*,E Czubak-K Puczyński | 11 | NS | 6![]() | E | 5 | -1 | +50 | 87.50% | 49.71% | |||
| M Malinowska-E Czubak,K Puczyński-* | 12 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | +1 | -630 | 66.67% | 50.12% | |||
| 15 | M Krajewski-E Miszewska,J Stępiński-* | 13 | WE | 3![]() | N | A | -2 | +200 | 83.33% | 50.89% | ||
| M Krajewski-J Stępiński,*-E Miszewska | 14 | WE | 3![]() | W | 6 | -1 | -50 | 12.50% | 50.02% | |||
| M Krajewski-*,E Miszewska-J Stępiński | 15 | NS | 2![]() | W | J | +1 | -140 | 58.33% | 50.20% | |||
| SUMA: | 50.20% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 50.20% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 22 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2010-03-27 o 22:46:26