| TOP INDIVIDUAL 2010 29: L Ohrysko | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | K Jassem-*,G Narkiewicz-Z Ingielewicz | 1 | NS | 3![]() | S | Q | -2 | -100 | 41.67% | 41.67% | ||
| K Jassem-G Narkiewicz,Z Ingielewicz-* | 2 | WE | 2 × | E | 3 | -1 | -100 | 25.00% | 33.33% | |||
| K Jassem-Z Ingielewicz,*-G Narkiewicz | 3 | WE | 3![]() | E | 10 | +2 | +660 | 50.00% | 38.89% | |||
| 2 | M Kwiecień-*,E Miszewska-M Tekień | 4 | NS | 3![]() | E | 6 | = | -600 | 45.83% | 40.63% | ||
| M Kwiecień-E Miszewska,M Tekień-* | 5 | WE | 3![]() | W | 9 | -5 | -250 | 16.67% | 35.83% | |||
| M Kwiecień-M Tekień,*-E Miszewska | 6 | WE | 3![]() | N | J | -2 | +100 | 87.50% | 44.44% | |||
| 3 | T Przybora-*,P Jurek-M Krajewski | 7 | NS | 4![]() | W | 8 | = | -620 | 91.67% | 51.19% | ||
| T Przybora-P Jurek,M Krajewski-* | 8 | WE | 3 × | S | 9 | -3 | +500 | 100.00% | 57.29% | |||
| T Przybora-M Krajewski,*-P Jurek | 9 | WE | 3![]() | E | 2 | +1 | +630 | 29.17% | 54.17% | |||
| 4 | M Szymanowski-*,R Jagniewski-M Malinowska | 10 | NS | 6![]() | E | 10 | -1 | +100 | 62.50% | 55.00% | ||
| M Szymanowski-R Jagniewski,M Malinowska-* | 11 | WE | 1![]() | S | 10 | = | -90 | 70.83% | 56.44% | |||
| M Szymanowski-M Malinowska,*-R Jagniewski | 12 | WE | 4![]() | W | A | -2 | -100 | 0.00% | 51.74% | |||
| 5 | K Buras-*,J Ciechomski-J Brede | 13 | NS | 3![]() | N | J | +2 | +660 | 95.83% | 55.13% | ||
| K Buras-J Ciechomski,J Brede-* | 14 | WE | 7![]() | E | 3 | = | +1510 | 91.67% | 57.74% | |||
| K Buras-J Brede,*-J Ciechomski | 15 | WE | 5 × | E | A | -3 | -500 | 87.50% | 59.72% | |||
| 6 | A Kowalski-*,T Przybora-M Puczyński | 16 | NS | 5 × | S | 3 | -2 | -300 | 50.00% | 59.11% | ||
| A Kowalski-T Przybora,M Puczyński-* | 17 | WE | 6![]() | N | 4 | +1 | -940 | 29.17% | 57.35% | |||
| A Kowalski-M Puczyński,*-T Przybora | 18 | WE | 3![]() | E | 3 | -1 | -50 | 29.17% | 55.79% | |||
| 7 | J Pszczoła-*,C Balicki-A Ratyński | 19 | NS | 6![]() | N | 9 | -1 | -50 | 8.33% | 53.29% | ||
| J Pszczoła-C Balicki,A Ratyński-* | 20 | WE | 6![]() | N | Q | = | -1370 | 20.83% | 51.67% | |||
| J Pszczoła-A Ratyński,*-C Balicki | 21 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | = | -600 | 54.17% | 51.79% | |||
| 8 | A Malinowski-M Szymanowski,M Kwiecień-* | 22 | WE | 3 × | S | 2 | -2 | +300 | 75.00% | 52.84% | ||
| A Malinowski-M Kwiecień,*-M Szymanowski | 23 | WE | 3![]() | W | K | +1 | +630 | 75.00% | 53.80% | |||
| A Malinowski-*,M Szymanowski-M Kwiecień | 24 | NS | 6![]() | N | 3 | = | +980 | 100.00% | 55.73% | |||
| 9 | G Narkiewicz-L Kurzela,*-A Kowalski | 25 | WE | 3![]() | N | A | = | -140 | 91.67% | 57.17% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,A Kowalski-L Kurzela | 26 | NS | 3![]() | S | 3 | +2 | +660 | 100.00% | 58.81% | |||
| G Narkiewicz-A Kowalski,L Kurzela-* | 27 | WE | 2![]() | N | 3 | = | -110 | 20.83% | 57.41% | |||
| 10 | *-J Russyan,K Puczyński-L Kurzela | 28 | NS | 4![]() | E | J | +1 | -450 | 45.83% | 56.99% | ||
| *-K Puczyński,L Kurzela-J Russyan | 29 | NS | 5 × | S | K | = | +750 | 87.50% | 58.05% | |||
| *-L Kurzela,J Russyan-K Puczyński | 30 | NS | 4![]() | E | A | = | -420 | 45.83% | 57.64% | |||
| 11 | E Grabowska-T Puczyński,M Kwiecień-* | 1 | WE | 4 × | W | 10 | -3 | -500 | 8.33% | 56.05% | ||
| E Grabowska-M Kwiecień,*-T Puczyński | 2 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | +1 | -170 | 29.17% | 55.21% | |||
| E Grabowska-*,T Puczyński-M Kwiecień | 3 | NS | 3![]() | E | J | +2 | -660 | 45.83% | 54.92% | |||
| 12 | M Kwiecień-J Pszczoła,*-W Olański | 4 | WE | 3![]() | S | 10 | +1 | -630 | 4.17% | 53.43% | ||
| M Kwiecień-*,W Olański-J Pszczoła | 5 | NS | 3 × | E | Q | -1 | +100 | 16.67% | 52.38% | |||
| M Kwiecień-W Olański,J Pszczoła-* | 6 | WE | 4![]() | N | A | = | -420 | 37.50% | 51.97% | |||
| 13 | T Puczyński-J Russyan,J Kalita-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | S | 5 | +1 | -650 | 12.50% | 50.90% | ||
| T Puczyński-J Kalita,*-J Russyan | 8 | WE | 5 × | S | 4 | -3 | +500 | 91.67% | 51.97% | |||
| T Puczyński-*,J Russyan-J Kalita | 9 | NS | 4![]() | N | K | = | +420 | 59.04% | 52.15% | |||
| 14 | A Kowalski-*,J Kalita-G Narkiewicz | 10 | NS | 3![]() | W | 6 | = | -600 | 54.17% | 52.21% | ||
| A Kowalski-J Kalita,G Narkiewicz-* | 11 | WE | 6![]() | E | 5 | -1 | -50 | 12.50% | 51.24% | |||
| A Kowalski-G Narkiewicz,*-J Kalita | 12 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | +3 | -690 | 33.33% | 50.81% | |||
| 15 | M Szymanowski-*,G Narkiewicz-Z Ingielewicz | 13 | NS | 4![]() | S | Q | +1 | +150 | 70.83% | 51.28% | ||
| M Szymanowski-G Narkiewicz,Z Ingielewicz-* | 14 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | -1 | +50 | 25.00% | 50.68% | |||
| M Szymanowski-Z Ingielewicz,*-G Narkiewicz | 15 | WE | 3 × | N | A | -3 | +800 | 100.00% | 51.78% | |||
| SUMA: | 51.78% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 51.78% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 18 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2010-03-27 o 22:46:26