| TOP INDIVIDUAL 2010 52: M Malinowska | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | J Kalita-V Vainikonis,K Kotorowicz-* | 1 | WE | 2![]() | E | 2 | +2 | +170 | 91.67% | 91.67% | ||
| J Kalita-K Kotorowicz,*-V Vainikonis | 2 | WE | 1![]() | S | K | -2 | +200 | 83.33% | 87.50% | |||
| J Kalita-*,V Vainikonis-K Kotorowicz | 3 | NS | 4![]() | S | 8 | -4 | -200 | 100.00% | 91.67% | |||
| 2 | K Jassem-J Stępiński,A Ratyński-* | 4 | WE | 3![]() | E | 2 | = | +600 | 54.17% | 82.29% | ||
| K Jassem-A Ratyński,*-J Stępiński | 5 | WE | 1![]() | N | 5 | +1 | -120 | 75.00% | 80.83% | |||
| K Jassem-*,J Stępiński-A Ratyński | 6 | NS | 4![]() | N | 4 | -2 | -100 | 12.50% | 69.44% | |||
| 3 | K Lasocki-T Winciorek,E Miszewska-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | W | 6 | +2 | +680 | 91.67% | 72.62% | ||
| K Lasocki-E Miszewska,*-T Winciorek | 8 | WE | 4![]() | W | 2 | -1 | -50 | 20.83% | 66.15% | |||
| K Lasocki-*,T Winciorek-E Miszewska | 9 | NS | 3![]() | W | 5 | +2 | -660 | 33.33% | 62.50% | |||
| 4 | M Szymanowski-L Ohrysko,R Jagniewski-* | 10 | WE | 6![]() | E | 10 | -1 | -100 | 37.50% | 60.00% | ||
| M Szymanowski-R Jagniewski,*-L Ohrysko | 11 | WE | 1![]() | S | 10 | = | -90 | 70.83% | 60.98% | |||
| M Szymanowski-*,L Ohrysko-R Jagniewski | 12 | NS | 4![]() | W | A | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 64.24% | |||
| 5 | B Chmurski-Ł Brede,T Townsend-* | 13 | WE | 4![]() | W | 5 | -1 | -100 | 91.67% | 66.35% | ||
| B Chmurski-T Townsend,*-Ł Brede | 14 | WE | 7![]() | E | 10 | = | +1520 | 100.00% | 68.75% | |||
| B Chmurski-*,Ł Brede-T Townsend | 15 | NS | 5 × | E | 8 | -3 | +500 | 12.50% | 65.00% | |||
| 6 | G Narkiewicz-C Balicki,J Pszczoła-* | 16 | WE | 5 × | S | 6 | -2 | +300 | 50.00% | 64.06% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-J Pszczoła,*-C Balicki | 17 | WE | 5![]() | N | 2 | +2 | -440 | 100.00% | 66.18% | |||
| G Narkiewicz-*,C Balicki-J Pszczoła | 18 | NS | 2 × | S | J | -2 | -500 | 4.17% | 62.73% | |||
| 7 | T Puczyński-P Gawryś,G Narkiewicz-* | 19 | WE | 5![]() | S | A | = | -450 | 37.50% | 61.40% | ||
| T Puczyński-G Narkiewicz,*-P Gawryś | 20 | WE | 6![]() | S | 7 | -1 | +100 | 95.83% | 63.13% | |||
| T Puczyński-*,P Gawryś-G Narkiewicz | 21 | NS | 3![]() | N | Q | +1 | +630 | 83.33% | 64.09% | |||
| 8 | C Balicki-J Pszczoła,P Gawryś-* | 22 | WE | 3![]() | S | 6 | -2 | +100 | 29.17% | 62.50% | ||
| C Balicki-P Gawryś,*-J Pszczoła | 23 | WE | 6![]() | W | K | -1 | -100 | 16.67% | 60.51% | |||
| C Balicki-*,J Pszczoła-P Gawryś | 24 | NS | 4![]() | S | 3 | +2 | +490 | 50.00% | 60.07% | |||
| 9 | C Balicki-A Ratyński,*-P Gawryś | 25 | WE | 4 × | N | 3 | +1 | -690 | 8.33% | 58.00% | ||
| C Balicki-*,P Gawryś-A Ratyński | 26 | NS | 5![]() | N | Q | -2 | -200 | 8.33% | 56.09% | |||
| C Balicki-P Gawryś,A Ratyński-* | 27 | WE | 2![]() | N | 3 | = | -110 | 20.83% | 54.78% | |||
| 10 | C Balicki-*,P Gawryś-A Ratyński | 28 | NS | 4![]() | E | 6 | +1 | -450 | 45.83% | 54.46% | ||
| C Balicki-P Gawryś,A Ratyński-* | 29 | WE | 3![]() | W | A | -1 | -100 | 75.00% | 55.17% | |||
| C Balicki-A Ratyński,*-P Gawryś | 30 | WE | 4![]() | W | A | = | +420 | 54.17% | 55.14% | |||
| 11 | W Olański-*,K Kotorowicz-J Russyan | 1 | NS | 4 × | W | K | -2 | +300 | 4.17% | 53.49% | ||
| W Olański-K Kotorowicz,J Russyan-* | 2 | WE | 4![]() | N | 2 | = | -620 | 12.50% | 52.21% | |||
| W Olański-J Russyan,*-K Kotorowicz | 3 | WE | 4 × | S | A | -3 | +500 | 16.67% | 51.14% | |||
| 12 | K Kotorowicz-K Puczyński,E Vainikonis-* | 4 | WE | 3![]() | S | 10 | = | -600 | 33.33% | 50.61% | ||
| K Kotorowicz-E Vainikonis,*-K Puczyński | 5 | WE | 2 × | S | 10 | +1 | -870 | 4.17% | 49.29% | |||
| K Kotorowicz-*,K Puczyński-E Vainikonis | 6 | NS | 4 × | W | 5 | -2 | +500 | 100.00% | 50.69% | |||
| 13 | L Kurzela-A Kowalski,M Krajewski-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | S | 10 | +1 | -650 | 12.50% | 49.66% | ||
| L Kurzela-M Krajewski,*-A Kowalski | 8 | WE | 3![]() | E | 9 | +3 | +230 | 50.00% | 49.67% | |||
| L Kurzela-*,A Kowalski-M Krajewski | 9 | NS | 4![]() | N | A | -1 | -50 | 18.42% | 48.87% | |||
| 14 | *-K Puczyński,T Townsend-E Czubak | 10 | NS | 3![]() | W | 5 | = | -600 | 54.17% | 49.00% | ||
| *-T Townsend,E Czubak-K Puczyński | 11 | NS | 6![]() | E | 5 | -1 | +50 | 87.50% | 49.94% | |||
| *-E Czubak,K Puczyński-T Townsend | 12 | NS | 3![]() | N | 3 | +1 | +630 | 33.33% | 49.55% | |||
| 15 | *-Z Kowalewski,E Vainikonis-M Puczyński | 13 | NS | 3![]() | N | 9 | = | +110 | 41.67% | 49.36% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,M Puczyński-Z Kowalewski | 14 | NS | 3![]() | S | J | -3 | -150 | 50.00% | 49.38% | |||
| *-M Puczyński,Z Kowalewski-E Vainikonis | 15 | NS | 2![]() | E | J | +1 | -140 | 58.33% | 49.58% | |||
| SUMA: | 49.58% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 49.58% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 25 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2010-03-27 o 22:46:26